One more
public thread on SW list on our favourite issue. But some interesting points to note in the current discussion, well summed up by Aldo Gangemi at mid-course.
- We definitely need some property or mechanism, weaker than owl:sameAs, to assert that two URIs have similar referents.
- The semiotic aspects of co-reference are more and more acknowledged, even by formal logic gurus.
Hopefully this thread will eventually have some follow-up on some standardization track.
Yes, a wonderful topic being discussed, by the W#C folks. You may also enjoy the following thread on the ontolog forum where thing get a quite a bit deeper than RDF and OWL ...
ReplyDeleteAlso, you may enjoy my post from last month called "A New List of Categories"
http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=13
Rick
oops, forgot the link ...
ReplyDeletehttp://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2008-05/msg00120.html
follow the discussion with Pat Hayes, John Sowa and Chris Menzel ...
BTW - more to come on the discussion !